Former Basketball: The Coach Who Fought Back – New York Times Story – Coach Beryl Shipley

Op-Ed Columnist

The Coach Who Fought Back

By JOE NOCERA, New York Times

Published: March 29, 2013

In 1966, Beryl Shipley, the basketball coach at the University of Southwestern Louisiana, recruited three African-Americans to play for the Ragin’ Cajuns. Although the school, now known as the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, had accepted black students since the mid-1950s, its teams remained segregated — as did every college athletic team in the state. 

The board of education reacted by informing the N.C.A.A. that Shipley and the university were in violation of N.C.A.A. rules.

An organization with a moral compass would have refused to allow itself to be a pawn in a segregationist effort to preserve an all-white team. But the N.C.A.A. has never had a moral compass. So instead, it assigned a new hire, Warren Brown, to investigate, and, in 1968, it issued the first in a series of harsh penalties: two years’ probation, with no television or postseason appearances during that time. Shipley left college coaching, in disgust, in 1973. Brown rose to become the N.C.A.A.’s enforcement chief.

What brought this long-forgotten story to mind was the sight, on Thursday, of another coach who’d been railroaded unfairly with the willing participation of the N.C.A.A. Tim Cohane, 70, sat in a federal courthouse in Buffalo, while his lawyer, Sean O’Leary, argued that his long-running lawsuits against the N.C.A.A., the Mid-America Conference and SUNY Buffalo, where he was once head basketball coach, deserved to be heard by a jury. Cohane’s essential complaint is that in 1999, a new athletic director, Bob Arkeilpane, ginned up a series of phony N.C.A.A. rules violations to force out Cohane. (As a state employee with a contract, Cohane was difficult to fire without cause.)

And, once again, the N.C.A.A. obliged. Although the primary alleged violation — watching prospects work out in a gym — is incredibly insignificant, the N.C.A.A. charged Cohane with unethical conduct and hit him with a dreaded “show cause” order. Any school that wanted to hire him as head coach would have had to explain its decision to the N.C.A.A. Branded with that Scarlet “A,” as O’Leary put it in court, Cohane’s career as a college head coach was over.

In legal terms, the importance of the Cohane case is that, should he win, the N.C.A.A. would be labeled a “state actor.” It would then have to employ real due process, just like any state agency. It would upend a 25-year-old Supreme Court ruling, in a famous case involving Jerry Tarkanian, the former head coach at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas, that the N.C.A.A. was not a state actor. Thus it could treat those under its purview as shabbily as it saw fit — which it has done ever since.

At the hearing, the N.C.A.A.’s lawyer argued that the case should be tossed solely because his client was not a state actor. To the N.C.A.A., its despicable role in destroying Cohane’s career is irrelevant.

When it was his turn to speak, O’Leary, a fiery man who once played for Cohane, angrily dredged up examples of heinous behavior by the defendants. How, with the seniors’ eligibility having expired, thus putting them out of reach of the N.C.A.A., the school threatened to withhold their diplomas if they didn’t cooperate with investigators. How several players who had sided with Cohane were pressured to change their tune. How the Mid-America Conference secretly back-dated a damning report — a report Cohane only discovered seven years into the litigation. How a back channel developed between the conference and the N.C.A.A. as they conspired to give Arkeilpane what he wanted: a report that would doom the coach. (Arkeilpane, now at the University of Cincinnati, declined comment.) How a Buffalo assistant coach whom Cohane had decided to fire after he was caught in a hotel room groping two high school girls — a photo of the incident is part of the evidence — was the only one of Cohane’s staff to keep his job. The N.C.A.A. and SUNY Buffalo gave him a pass because he had aided in the investigation.

I have no insight into whether Cohane will prevail. During nearly a decade’s worth of litigation, the lower courts have generally been hostile to Cohane, while the court of appeals has sided with him. What I do know is that Cohane is the first head coach since Tarkanian to stand and fight when the N.C.A.A. brought dubious charges without any due process. A Cohane victory would help restore some integrity to a process that has been corrupt at least since the days of Beryl Shipley and Southwestern Louisiana.